The type of content found on these channels and the demographics that watch them is completely different to that found on traditional TV. Social platforms such as YouTube also enable brands to do much more targeted marketing, as the content tends to be more niche and the data such as engagement etc.
If done correctly, brands stand to achieve a much higher ROI than with traditional TV advertising thus contributing towards the shift from TV to digital advertising.
For many people who were alone and not working during the weeks of lockdown, live broadcast TV scheduling provided an element of structure that was otherwise lost. In the UK, there was also a feeling that traditional TV as a source of news was more trustworthy in times of uncertainty and danger in contrast to a lot of the fake news that is shared on social media.
How different sources of news were considered trustworthy during the pandemic. It remains to be seen whether this renewed love of TV will last in the long term - there are already signs that the ratings spikes at the beginning of the pandemic are beginning to flatten. If it does continue, however, TV show ratings may become more relevant to brands again. Where we are likely to see a shift towards though, is tracking social TV. This means tracking engagement and conversations happening on social media channels about particular TV shows - something Nielsen Social is already doing.
Nielsen Social compiles social content ratings weekly top 10 lists. By tracking this alongside traditional TV show ratings, brands not only learn which shows are being watched most, but also what people really think of them.
Brands can also get a more accurate picture of the audience demographic, as tracking social conversations is not limited to a focus group, allowing for more targeted advertising across more channels. In addition, it opens up a channel for brands to communicate with their target audience and can help to plan content for social strategies, ultimately offering even more return on the original investment.
As a news addict, regular traveler and lover of learning, she's amassed a collection of pretty useless facts. When she's not working, you'll find her with a cup of tea and a good book, her favorite podcast or more likely watching a home renovation TV show. We use cookies to enhance your experience when visiting our website. Our cookies policy describes how we use cookies and how to disable them. OK Learn more. Contact us. Free tools. Choose your language. Do you know that we are indexing all major social networks in languages.
Free Demo. Platform Consumer Intelligence Acceleration Platform. Services Talkwalker Activate. Brand management Campaign strategy Competitive intelligence Content marketing Customer experience Market research Trend analysis.
The company has been measuring television audiences since , when TV sets were just beginning to appear in many households. TV ratings provide valuable insights into how many people are consuming content, as well as how and when they do so. That information is useful for advertisers, networks, and other entities in the media industry that make content or market products and services.
Since it's a tall feat to measure the viewing habits of every single person in the U. It's the same technique that pollsters use to predict the outcome of elections. Nielsen recruits people to join its TV ratings panels and measures what they watch, how often they watch it, and how long they watch it.
Nielsen then extrapolates the data that it collects from these sample audiences to draw conclusions about larger populations. That's a simple way of explaining a complicated, extensive process. Around 20, households are included in the representative sample for the national ratings estimates.
Though this number is a small percentage of the million homes with TVs in the U. Panelists are strategically selected. They provide Nielsen with information about their gender, household income, and ethnicity.
To measure how panelists watch TV, Nielsen uses a combination of panel data, data from cable and satellite set top boxes, and census data from digital devices collected through measurement tags in content. Nielsen ratings tell media participants who was exposed to content and advertising. We use multiple metrics such as reach, frequency, averages and the well known ratings—the percentage of a specific population that was exposed to content and ads—to determine exposure.
To measure TV audiences and derive our viewing metrics i. In the United States, NBC Universal used the Summer Olympics of and Winter Olympics of to conduct large-scale research on online, mobile and television viewing and to track advertising recall across media.
In NBC's case, the research push reflected dissatisfaction with Nielsen's ratings system's capacity to capture viewing and engagement patterns of newly dispersed audiences and concern about its shrinking share of the advertising market. NBC's research, and that of the BBC and other content providers, into mobile media use has significant implications for the future of programming, scheduling, online strategy and audience measurement.
During the Beijing Olympic Games in August , NBC worked with a variety of research companies measuring viewing on its subscription channels, its website and its service for mobile audiences. Unique browsers, video streams, page views, and time spent online at NBCOlympics. An online survey was conducted by Knowledge Networks of different Olympics watchers per day who kept a media diary to record how they watched the Olympics, where, when and on what media.
Integrated Media Measurement Inc. IMMI established a panel of 40 people with cell phones equipped to record sound bytes in programme signals that allow measurement of time spent watching or interacting with Olympics coverage on all platforms throughout the day. Nielsen measured television ratings, Rentrak monitored video-on-demand usage, and viewing through personal video recorders was also counted.
Over 17 days, NBC distributed 3, hours of video over broadcast and cable television, via the website, and over mobile telephone networks. Research company Keller Fay was hired to monitor social networking sites and viral communication. Once again, the scale of the research, and the associated costs, make such ventures special rather than regular events, and it is difficult to see many individual media companies taking on such an exercise alone in the future. Efforts to monitor audience behaviour anytime, anywhere, on any device, have been hampered by differences between media in the metrics, methods and terminology used to track audiences, as well as by the lack of broadly accepted standards in online viewing measurement.
New metrics and analytical systems that have been developed to answer some of the questions raised by technological change also pose challenges to ratings providers about their capacity to deal with the explosion of raw and customized data on audience behaviour.
The volume of information about audience and consumer behaviour that is available for aggregation and analysis has grown enormously, but with it has come a host of uncertainties about the direction and use of audience measurement, and of the ratings. Uncertainty has driven an extraordinary research effort, a flight to accountability, in which a proliferating number of information and research companies have tried to make sense of the accumulating data about media use, often with conflicting results.
Despite the crisis, which is multifaceted, ratings data are still and will continue to be in demand because there will always be need and use for common currencies for buying and selling advertising and programme content.
There will undoubtedly be changes in the practicalities of audience measurement, particularly given the challenges presented by the likely spread of broadband-enabled set-top boxes. The emotionally engaged audience is valued extremely highly for the bond they form with a brand. The Multiscreen Engagement study surveyed 20, people to discern engagement with MTV programmes across media. For audiences to seek out and proliferate content about a particular programme across media and devices, the study found that a strong emotional connection or level of engagement must be present.
In a paper presented at the Advertising Research Foundation's annual convention in , British academic Robert Heath developed definitions of attention and engagement, and outlined the distinction between them:. Heath This approach turns on its head Lavidge and Steiner's influential thesis that argues that motivation is the sole influence on decision-making Lavidge and Steiner Heath argues that emotional and subconscious processing form attitudes about decisions before conscious thought kicks in.
If this is the case, then tapping into that feeling will be enormously profitable for advertisers. A variety of techniques and methods fall under this definition.
First, electroencephalography or EEG, in which the viewer-subject wears a hat or helmet to which a number of sensors are attached. The sensors measure brain activity indicative of attention, emotional engagement and memory retention. Second, functional magnetic resonance fMRI measures brain activity by monitoring blood flows that accompany neural activity. Unlike an earlier method of generating images of brain activity, positron emission tomography or PET, fMRI is non-invasive not requiring injection of radioactive isotopes as in PET and quick to perform.
The disadvantages of fMRI include its cost, and the requirement that viewer-subjects must be placed in an fMRI machine although the machines are becoming smaller and more portable.
Third, other physiological measures such as galvanic skin response and heart-rate monitoring which measure stress or emotional response can be combined with eye-tracking and facial expression monitoring to measure attention and engagement. These methods may then be followed up through interviews. Unlike studies of engagement which rely on self-reporting and which, as a result, may be prone to a variety of errors, neuromarketing claims insight into responses to advertising that are unmediated by conscious thought or reflection.
Interest in neuromarketing has been stoked by a number of recent developments. In February , Nielsen made a strategic investment in NeuroFocus, a company based in Berkeley, California, that uses brainwave analysis, eye-tracking and skin conductance tests to measure the effectiveness of advertising, branding, packaging, pricing and product design. In partnership, the companies became exclusive providers of neuromarketing research to film studios and television networks.
Each year, Sands Research releases split-screen videos showing the EEG data of the brain activity of a panel of viewers watching commercials screened during the NFL Super Bowl, traditionally the highest rating programme of the year. In Figure 5. Neuro-Insight is a rapidly growing company that has worked with major advertisers in Australia and from in Europe, following a deal with German media-buying agency Media Plus, who will provide neuromarketing research services under licence to advertisers and the media in Germany, Switzerland and Austria.
Interestingly both Sands Research and Neuro-Insight's work has been used to argue the importance of story and narrative in producing successfully engaging content, which may be enough to ensure the survival of film and television drama. The neuromarketing area illustrates the trends of convergence and proliferation that are shaping audience and consumer research.
On one hand there is conglomeration, with Nielsen using its financial muscle to buy up competitors or start-ups it finds useful. On the other there is proliferation, as a growing number of firms are established, new metrics and technologies are developed, and existing ones modified. But neuromarketing is not an uncontested emerging technology for ranking and rating responses to content.
There have been concerns raised about the commercialization of academic research in this field, with one prestigious neuroscience journal dismissing neuromarketing as little more than a new fad, exploited by scientists and marketing consultants to blind corporate clients with science Nature Neuroscience , and another raising concerns about the ethics of using brain imaging techniques for marketing and market-related purposes Lancet Neurology Then there is the small matter of the complex and subjective nature of human emotional experience or the individual's life context, affecting results.
Neuromarketing is also a costly form of research, which limits the number of participants. It is also often conducted outside the normal or familiar viewing environment, and participants often have to wear special equipment or be subjected to various tests which will be difficult to replicate across a larger population.
Timeshifting of viewing has been possible since the introduction of the home VCR, but it has become more of an issue since the introduction of digital video recorders DVRs as a new technology of counting. The measure provides an average rating for the commercial minutes in each television programme, covering live viewing; live viewing plus DVR playback on the same day; and live viewing plus DVR playback for one, two, three and seven days.
At the time of the introduction of the Average Commercial Minute measure, Nielsen reported that:. Among households with DVRs, the average primetime broadcast program audience increases 40 per cent when including same day DVR playback and 73 per cent when including three days of playback. Audiences for commercial minutes within these broadcast programs increase 18 per cent and 32 per cent respectively.
Both cable network and syndicated programs and commercials also show increases, although at lower rates. Nielsen At present, ratings are only provided initially for programmes viewed live and recorded on the same day of transmission, with consolidated figures for all viewers capturing timeshifted viewing only up to seven days after transmission.
The BBC will also soon begin to publish consolidated data which will include content viewed on DVRs and the BBC iPlayer, which is reported to have had million programme requests since the end of , with an average , users requesting more than 1. According to the Guardian :. Timeshifting is booming … Drama was by far the most popular timeshifted genre, with only 63 per cent of series and 68 per cent of soaps viewed live in the first two months of , according to Sky's figures.
With repeats and on-demand included, its total audience reached 1. Plunkett The issue of measuring timeshifted viewing has historically been one of the main subjects of dispute between subscription television operators and OzTAM in Australia.
Foxtel launched the iQ box which incorporated a DVR in February , and in the same month OzTAM changed its methodology for measuring subscription television audiences, weighting data from this panel separately from the regional and metropolitan free-to-air broadcasting panels to better reflect age and demographic spreads and larger average household size of subscribers.
The change in methodology was anticipated to result in an increase in ratings for subscription services Sinclair By November , more than one million digital set-top boxes were reported to have been installed in Australian homes, but according to research by OzTAM and Eureka Strategy for the Australian Communications and Media Authority, only 10 per cent were being used to pick up enhanced digital services Douglas In March , ASTRA called for tenders for its audience measurement contract, which was due to expire at the end of
0コメント