Solid cable, such as Cat5e solidcore cable , is normally used for covering longer network cable distances. The recommended Cat5e cable length is similar to the standards for other twisted-pair cables.
The maximum for a CAT5e cable segment is m. Category 5 Enhanced cable supports up to Mbps Gigabit Ethernet speeds as four wire pairs are utilized. I leave it on the spool but manage to get to both end of the cable and put ends on it. I set the camera three times higher than normal for bitrate, Works perfectly. I run a ping application for a week to the camera and it never drops a ping, and I never even get bad latency.
I have the camera recording to my camera software during the test, no issues. Today I connected the same cable to my desktop to see what it negotiated at and I got mb. No loss. No issues I can detect at all on a foot cable still rolled up in a spool!
I have to think I can install my IP cameras out to feet easily and be perfectly safe. I wen back and checked the switches that have been in for a month and they too connected to each other at 1gb, I'd never checked before today. I've read and read and it seems no one has done any real testing of longer cables, everyone just says it will not work or you will have problems.
I'm not seeing any indications of issues, what other testing should I do? For cameras I'd be perfectly happy with a 10mb connection but it seems 1gb works fine too.
Anyone else actually test longer runs with success? The limit is for the same reason as the minimum bend radii and separation from AC cables. Cable installed to spec will definitely have electrical characteristics within acceptable limits all of the time. Once you exceed the spec, you may get lucky, you may not. You're not introducing EMF pollution into your spool, also by leaving on the spool you are ducing your loss of data due attenuation.
Basically this is not a real world test and was really a waste of time lol. Also, I am fairly certain that there is no where that says straight up "this won't work". This distance has the most chance to have a certified run, to be certified you can only have a certain amount of data packet loss over a specific distance I don't know what they specs are. There is also a difference between solid and stranded, shielded or unshielded, and punched down or terminated with an RJ Chances are it will work and it will work for what you need, chances are it will certify, chances are foot run will go through the center of a bunch of volt cables and be completely wiped out.
Don't forget though that I have feet of cable installed, real world and working fine. The switch is beside a main breaker box, runs in conduit over to outside, down a fence line, beside outside light poles, down outside buildings and over a few wallpack lights. This is in basic PVC conduit but is still outside and a long run. Also, not feet away is a major cell tower on our property.
I feel that was a pretty good test and I did not expect it to work at all, let alone 1gb. Wouldn't on the spool be the "ideal" test environment? No interference, no one has yanked on it yet, etc. It's math, after the recommended limit you have more degradation in signal and can be more prime to interference, as others have said it's not a hard limit, just like Tylenol that's past its expiration has lost all its potential, but the efficacy of it will be degraded.
Any electrical signal has it's limits but they are influenced by a number or variable factors. TL;DR supposed to be guaranteed to work at rated speeds and specs if distance does not exceed m this us not a hard limit. Have you pushed traffic through that run? Copy a 5GB file over that line and see how it fares. The reason that it works is because the cable is shielded inside the conduit. Consider: Each cable connector crimped connector ends, wall plate subtracts from the m spec, whereas additional shielding grounded, metal conduit adds to the m specification.
Collisions will be handled properly, signal levels at the ends will be within specification. The largest problem you could have on such a long cable is that collisions won't be handled properly.
When two signals go down the wire at the same time, there is a collision, and the reflected signal has to travel back to its origin. The delay between sending the signal and receiving a collision helps the NIC to determine an appropriate delay to try sending the signal again.
A single run of Ethernet cable is designed to function at a maximum distance of meters, or feet. It may be possible to exceed this limit whilst maintaining network connectivity, but the chances of connectivity issues increase along with a higher likelihood of reduced speeds and overall reliability. Remember that this limit is for a single run of Ethernet cable.
If you need to extend a connection beyond meters, my recommendation is to get a basic network switch and place it between your router and the device you wish to connect. As long as both cables one between the router and the switch and the other between the switch and the device are each less than meters long each, a stable and reliable connection should be maintained. Home Network Geek is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.
Terms and Conditions. Privacy Policy. Contents hide. Why Is There a Limit? Does a Longer Cable Reduce Speeds? Footage Markings. Pre-made Ethernet Cable. Cable Tester. Can an Ethernet Cable Be Extended? Affiliate Disclosure. Learn More. Recent Articles. Will Ethernet Cable Lower Ping? Can Ethernet Cable Go Outside?
0コメント